Gov. Newsom has issued additional guidance further defining “Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers” that designates CPA services as “essential” and necessary to help ensure the continuity of functions critical to public health and safety, as well as economic security. View the updated list of essential critical infrastructure workers at CA.gov.
This guidance allows a CPA firm to continue to operate and go to their physical offices to perform critical functions that may not be able to be done remotely while the governor’s stay-at-home order is in place. This is an important clarification that allows CPAs to serve their clients and provide advice on critical financial and tax decisions during this crisis.
The guidance states: “Professional services, such as legal or accounting services, when necessary to assist in compliance with legally mandated activities and critical sector services” are considered essential. Additionally, workers in the financial services sector, including “workers who are needed to process and maintain systems for processing financial transactions and services (e.g., payment, clearing, and settlement; wholesale funding; insurance services; and capital markets activities)” are also considered essential.
When the governor issued Executive Order N-33-20 directing all residents to immediately heed state public health directives to stay home, CalCPA was concerned the order may inadvertently prevent CPAs from continuing to provide certain services to business and individuals. Accordingly, we sought guidance from the administration on these orders to clarify “essential businesses and services” and urged that CPA services be included.
Even with the new guidance, CPAs and CPA firms should be judicious about how they operate and take appropriate steps to follow guidance from state public health officials to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 virus.
The IRS has established a special section focused on steps to help taxpayers, businesses and others affected by the coronavirus. This page will be updated as new information is available. For other information about the COVID-19 virus, people should visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (https://www.coronavirus.gov) for health information. Other information about actions being taken by the U.S. government is available at https://www.usa.gov/coronavirus and in Spanish at https://gobierno.usa.gov/coronavirus. The Department of Treasury also has information available at Coronavirus: Resources, Updates, and What You Should Know.
Donations – Cannabis and Product -Beginning March 1, 2020, cannabis retailers may provide free cannabis or cannabis products to qualified medicinal patients or their primary caregivers. This change is due to the adoption of Senate Bill 34, which also exempts these donated items from excise, sales and use, and cultivation taxes.
Licensed cultivators, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, or micro-businesses may designate cannabis or cannabis products that they hold in their inventory for donation. Items designated for donation may only be provided to a medicinal patient or primary caregiver through a licensed retailer.
Key Requirements for Donations
Special Requirements for Retailers
Designating Packages for Donation in the California Cannabis Track-and-Trace System
All items intended for donation must be marked as such in the California Cannabis Track-and-Trace system. A bulletin with step-by-step instructions for designating new or existing packages of cannabis, cannabis products, and immature plants, and for entering retail donations of these items, has been posted in the California Cannabis Track-and-Trace system. Licensees can log into their Metrc account and find this bulletin under the Messages tab (it appears as an envelope in the top-left corner).
WAKE UP CALIFORNIA!, On February 14th the Los Angeles Times published an article by Joe Mozingo entitled “Cannabis Farm Was a Model for California’s Legal Industry”. Then Came a Sheriff’s Raid.” The article suggests the law enforcement officers who executed the search warrant were surprised by the extent of the criminal activity at this “model” cannabis farm. Wake up California! Wake up Santa Barbara County!
The article provides interesting background relating to the explosion of Santa Barbara County’s cannabis industry as well as the development of this particular farm. The article describes how Santa Barbara County jumped into the “Rush for the Green” with both feet and great enthusiasm. The article also suggests it is a surprise to some – perhaps many – that this “model” cannabis farm is a multi-million-dollar criminal conspiracy.
Wake up! No Californian should be surprised in the slightest! Every individual involved in plant-touching activities in California’s cannabis industry is a criminal. Every individual involved in plant-touching cannabis business activities in California is engaged in the distribution of a controlled substance – a criminal violation of federal law. Those individuals who are involved in a business in this industry but do not touch the plants could be charged as criminal co-conspirators.
Eight years ago, the information published by Joe Mozingo last Friday would have been promptly followed by an announcement from the Office of the U.S. Attorney that it already has pending a criminal investigation of the cannabis industry in Santa Barbara County. The announcement would have explained the pending criminal investigation relates to public corruption, tax evasion and money laundering. The announcement would have been made whether or not it was true.
It has been less than eight years since the DEA, the Criminal Investigation Division of IRS and the Office of the U.S. Marshal executed search warrants secured by the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California on eight different locations in Oakland that were associated with Oaksterdam University and its founder, Richard Lee. In the raid on Oaksterdam on April 2, 2012, the federal government simultaneously seized every cannabis plant; every item of electronic equipment; every business record; and every safe along with contents from each of eight locations located in Oakland that were associated with Richard Lee and Oaksterdam.
How times have changed. The U.S. Attorney General now has bigger fish to fry, or to protect, depending on your political persuasion. Washington, D.C. will allow California to wallow in the mess it has made of its cannabis industry. Any association with the mess California has made of cannabis legalization has an immense political downside and little, if any, political upside.
A substantial majority of Californians agree that the roll-out of cannabis regulation cannabis is an unmitigated disaster. It is virtually impossible to find a rational person who does not agree that California made many errors in implementing regulation. There is a diversity of opinion on the reasons for the disaster but almost unanimous agreement on the disaster. The Santa Barbara situation described in the article is merely one of the thousands of such symptoms that exist throughout California.
We were surprised by Joe Mozingo’s article, but for different reasons than those expressed in the article. We were surprised it took the execution of a search warrant by the Santa Barbara County Sheriff to “discover” this “model” operation is a multi-million-dollar criminal conspiracy. Anyone who knows anything about California’s cannabis industry knows that criminal conduct permeates every level and every facet of the industry.
Santa Barbara County very likely produces more cannabis at this date than any other county. What did Santa Barbara County think the cultivators would do with this production capacity? Santa Barbara County has licensed 275 acres of canopy according to Joe Mozingo’s article. The bulk of this acreage can produce multiple crops each year. The article indicates these growers are doing precisely what Santa Barbara expected them to do – produce tons of cannabis.
Santa Barbara growers are producing tens of millions of dollars worth of cannabis. They are reporting and paying taxes on a significant portion. The same article, however, indicates a far larger portion of this production is not being reported. Of greater significance, it appears likely a substantial number of cannabis growers in Santa Barbara are engaged in tax evasion – conduct that may even rise to the level of criminal tax evasion.
One should not be harsh in one’s criticism of Santa Barbara County’s complicity. Carpenteria may smell like skunk, but the County collected $9.6M in taxes on cannabis that it did not have before it created this economic boom. The County very likely picked up a comparable amount of additional revenue in increases in real property taxes. The County receives approximately $1,500 of revenue for each Carpenteria resident who is suffering from the smell. The County also benefits from the increase in commercial activity.
Santa Barbara County differs from many other areas in California solely because it took a bigger and faster leap into California’s cannabis industry. Throughout California cities and counties have sought to take advantage of the economic opportunity that many perceived was created by Proposition 64. In the long-term Santa Barbara County may prove to be the County that most benefits from the “Rush for the Green.” It will be a number of years before the final results will be known.
California is entering its 3rd year of a regulated and taxed legal market. Presumably, most of the 275 acres that Santa Barbara has licensed are also licensed by CalCannabis? CalCannabis and BCC should know how much cannabis can be produced by this acreage, although it is far more important that CDTFA knows how much is being produced. CDTFA is the agency that collects Cannabis Cultivation Tax (“CCT”), Cannabis Excise Tax (“CET”), as well as Sales Tax and California income tax.
IRC §280E is not the problem for the California cannabis industry that has been so extensively described in various articles. The vast majority of the taxes imposed on California’s cannabis industry are local taxes or California taxes. Federal income taxes on California’s cannabis industry likely would make up less than 10% of the total tax load on the industry if the IRS was successful in collecting all such income taxes. The IRS does not collect a substantial portion of the income taxes that are owed to the federal government by participants in the industry.
The principal reason for this article is our surprise at the questions that Joe Mozingo did not ask. Where is CalCannabis? Where is the Bureau of Cannabis Control (“BCC”)? Where is the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“CDTFA”)? Where is Governor Newsom? Where is Xavier Becerra, California’s Attorney General? Why did California’s roll-out of regulation prove to be such a disaster? Could this disaster have been avoided? What can be done after 2+ years of bureaucratic ineptitude?
This disaster could not have been wholly avoided. Proposition 64 was ill-conceived and poorly drafted. We have previously written on this topic. [See Reboot in 2020!, and Implementing Proposition 64: Marijuana Policy in California ] The California Legislature and the administrative agencies it tasked with the regulation of this industry bear the principal responsibility for the disastrous roll-out of regulation. We have earlier commented on many of these issues. [See Greed and Cannabis, Major Cannabis Tremors! and IRC Sec. 280E Insanity].
Many points to unfair taxes on cannabis as a cause of problems for the industry. Complaints regarding taxes that are too high or that are unfair is a red herring. Consumers pay all taxes imposed on the movement of cannabis from cultivators to consumers. Even the income taxes imposed on the businesses involved in the movement of cannabis from the cultivator to a retail sale are collected from the consumer in the purchase price. It is the management of taxes that presents the challenge for a cannabis business not the rate of tax or the unfairness of its imposition.
The management of taxes in California’s cannabis industry is difficult. This difficulty is wholly the fault of the California Legislature, BCC, CalCannabis, and CDTFA. California made it difficult and costly for businesses to enter the regulated commercial cannabis market. California made it costly and difficult for a business to make money in its regulated commercial cannabis marketplace. California also made it far more attractive for a cannabis business to be only partially compliant with the law. California has achieved a wholly predictable result. The vast majority of California cannabis businesses are only partially compliant with the law whether or not they have some license.
Governor Newsom already knows some of the changes that must be made in order to bring California’s commercial cannabis industry under regulatory control. He has included the first steps in his proposed budget. However, there will always be many not-wholly-compliant commercial cannabis businesses until the profitability from a lack of complete compliance with the law does not outweigh the risks associated with non-compliance.
Money can be made in California’s cannabis industry by wholly compliant cannabis businesses that are well-advised. California’s cannabis industry is unfortunately filled with “experts” that know only a small portion of what they should know as a precondition to providing advice.
This is the first of a series of articles we intend to publish relating to the management of taxes in California’s cannabis industry which is the key to making money in wholly compliant cannabis businesses in California.
Who Paid For Those Reports? – it isn’t very often that we find something that boils my blood. However, today we ran across one that has the hair on the back of my neck standing up and I have be swearing for an hour. I gotta guess that quite a few people saw the announcement which was trumpeted from Politico Pro – California legislative adviser: State should tax cannabis based on potency…we rushed to the article only to discover…that
Historically, one of the most important responsibilities of the LAO has been to analyze the annual Governor’s budget. In recent years, the office has presented a series of analyses from the beginning to the end of the budget process on overarching fiscal issues as well as specific departmental budget proposals and offered its recommendations for legislative action. In order to provide the Legislature with timely advice on these matters, the LAO has published its budget comments and advice in the form of separate written reports, handouts for hearings, and entries in an online list. These documents help set the agenda for the work of the Legislature’s fiscal committees in developing a state budget. Staff of the office work with these committees throughout the budget process and provide public testimony on the office’s recommendations.
Who Paid For Those Reports?
More generally, the office is a staff resource to all legislators. The LAO also performs the following functions:
The “top secret report is “How High? Adjusting California’s Cannabis Taxes
Hey…Politico Pro….sap sucking pieces of shit…how about when research is produced using the the tax dollars of the people of California, you are welcome to disseminate the material, but not to put it behind a paywall and exploit it for your own gain. Thanks for an example of something that #fuck-trump would do.
aBIZinaBOX Moves West – we have been a bit quiet the past couple of weeks..and with good reason. We are in the midst of a move of our headquarters office from Evanston, IL to Oakland, CA. More specifically, our new headquarters is going to be in Jack London Square in Oakland. Our new address is 378 Embarcadero West, Suite 507, Oakland, CA 94607. The next month is going to be complete, hopefully, organized insanity.
We will keep all of you apprised as we move along. Clients if you need to read us…cell or email is best…Facebook is another good option.
We could write a novel about why we are moving out to Oakland…the plan had been three years from now. Every so often one gets a kick in that ass to get moving sooner. How about a shortlist of why now:
Well, Bruce Harris and Jeff Fishman singing Go West! by the Village People could drive anyone to move.
Ira Chaplik for always having something going on to motivate me.
Bill Taggart for constant motivation, and sharp pokes in the eye, done gently, go figure.
Philip Rodrigue and Minori Shironishi for constantly asking what is taking so long for me to move west.
Amit Chendal and Crystal Reliskni for constantly showing me the benefits of mentoring them.
John Sidline and Steve Mulhall for the inspiration that The Compound provides every day.
Tim Ray and Tim O’Brien for reminding me of the draw that Portland provides for the cannabis industry.
Sean Hocking for just being an all-around pain in the ass.
Kristen Yoder for being a friend and a source of insight.
Anne Marie Borgas and Chris for small farmers in Mendocino, Humbolt, and Trinity Counties.
Cara Luhring for being the “cannabis network” across Southern California.
Julie Klein for being a friend of almost forty years, in Santa Monica, as my perhaps oldest friend that made the trip and relocated in Southern California.
Andy Kane – my dear friend and partner from Arthur Andersen LLP in Los Angeles
It really isn’t like a relocation, its a reorganization, and our heartfelt thanks to all that are listed for doing their parts.